Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lindenberger, Deborah v. Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP et al
as 3:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lindenberger
Defendant:
Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP, Kirk Chewning, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HARDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24334
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE HARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lillian Easley v. Hummingbird Funds, et al
as 20-13644
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN (RANDY) CADOTTE, DAYLENE SHARLOW, HUMMINGBIRD FUNDS, d.b.a. Blue Trust Loans and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LILLIAN EASLEY, and all others similarly situated
Easley v. Hummingbird Loans et al
as 1:2019cv00937
Defendant:
Trina Starr, William Trepania, Lee Harden and others
Plaintiff:
Lillian Easley
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Harden v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04717
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Lee Harden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
USA v. Stacy Harden, Jr.
as 16-1227
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STACY LEE HARDEN, JR.
Harden v. Colvin
as 7:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Lee Harden
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Stacy Harden, Jr.
as 13-1323
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STACY LEE HARDEN, JR.
Harden et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Harden and Lucinda S. Harden
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Service Link, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
