Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
WATKINS, JR. v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03925
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE WATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THE ESTATE OF ROSIE LEE WATKINS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv20210
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ROSIE LEE WATKINS and TEIA DICKENS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. John Watkins
as 23-3467
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN LEE WATKINS
USA v. John Watkins
as 23-3091
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN LEE WATKINS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Watkins v. Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, Robert B Norris and Brett A. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Eckstrom, et al.
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Deputy J. Eckstrom and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Watkins v. Neil Turner
as 21-3766
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES LEE WATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN NEIL TURNER
Russell Watkins v. Gerald Baker
as 21-7014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL LEE WATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
GERALD BAKER, Wake County Sheriff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
