Cases 1 - 9 of 9
He v. United States of America
as 23-780
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Xuejie He
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, State of New Jersey and others
He v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Xuejie He
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, State of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Calixte v. Legal Service NYC
as 23-88
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Didier Calixte
Defendant / Appellee:
Legal Service NYC
Calixte v. Legal Service NYC
as 1:2022cv06018
Plaintiff:
Charles Didier Calixte
Defendant:
Legal Service NYC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Xuejie He, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-2546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
XUEJIE HE and HEYANGJING SHI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED, NEW YORK CITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW YORK, UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
