Cases 41 - 50 of 889
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael LeggettIn re: Michael Leggett
as 23-12056
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JERALD LEGGETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lewis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Billy James Lewis, Patrick Joseph Jessee, Fidel Jimenez, Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
LEGGETT v. WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LEGGETT
Defendant:
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Leggett v. Ontada et al
as 1:2023cv03743
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Leggett
Defendant:
Ms. Ducanuan Ontada, Portchester Police Department, Marcy Corr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
LEGGETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08878
Plaintiff:
JAMELL LEGGETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TANTON v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07507
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TANTON, MARK BAILEY, ANDREW ITO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
