Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hendricks Law Firm PC et al v. Foraker et al
as 3:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Hendricks Law firm PC and Heather A. Brann PC
Defendant:
Peggy Foraker and McKenzie Leigh Foraker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ross v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Heather Leigh Ross
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Ballering v. Morgan Stanley LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Joseph Miller, PHH Mortgage LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Lynn Ballering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ballering v. Morgan Stanley LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02164
Defendant:
Nobuyuki Hirano, Jami Miscik, Thomas H. Glocer and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Lynn Ballering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estate of Marc Douglass Duncan et al v. Wallowa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2019cv02017
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Leigh Bednar, Wallowa County Youth Services and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Duncan and Estate of Marc Douglass Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansfield v. Leigh et al
as 6:2019cv00254
Defendant:
Nathan Leigh and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Jaime A. Mansfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hix v. Whitaker et al
as 6:2019cv00190
Defendant:
Ellen Rosenblum and Matthew G. Whitaker
Plaintiff:
Steven Randolph Hix, Jr.
Petitioner:
Rhonda T. Favero, Stanley Dawidowicz, Lawrence L. Favero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
