Cases 11 - 20 of 189
Lema-Villa, et al v. Garland
as 23-1893
Petitioner:
OSWALDO LEMA-VILLA, MARIA FELICIDAD QUILLAY-LEON, G.C.L.Q. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Kupsky, Ronald v. Tritt et al
as 3:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lema Kupsky
Defendant:
Tritt, Brian Foster and Cindy O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Su v. ALJ Home Improvement, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv08478
Petitioner:
Julie A. Su
Respondent:
ALJ Home Improvement, Inc. and Jose Lema
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 662 Inj proceedings re dangerous emp conditions; by Sec.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Raul Ignacio Lema-Guaman v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3554
Petitioner:
RAUL IGNACIO LEMA-GUAMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Lema-Yaucan v. Melecio
as 7:2023cv03860
Petitioner:
Holger Lema-Yaucan
Respondent:
Superintendent Philip Melecio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angelina Portorreal v. Crane Cooling Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv02759
Defendant:
RAMON C. MALDONADO, CRANE COOLING CORP., LEMA REFRIGERATION SALES & SERVICES CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Angelina Portorreal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lema Nogales v. Garland
as 23-60150
Petitioner:
Carlos German Lema Nogales and Carlos Lema Nogales
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Lema Guaranga v. Mayorkas, et al.
as 1:2023cv10607
Plaintiff:
Jeanneth Alexandra Lema Guaranga
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, District Director Denis Riordan, Director UR JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
REINERT v. LEMA et al
as 5:2023cv01032
Plaintiff:
TINA REINERT
Defendant:
FRANKLIN LEMA, LEMA B&J TRUCKING CORPORATION and VOYAGER TRUCKING CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
