Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McCullom v. Still, et al
as 5:2021cv01742
Defendant:
Unknown, Steven R. Bang, Stephen Avila and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee McCullom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Juan Leos-Sanchez
as 16-51398
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN LEOS-SANCHEZ
Kevin McCullom v. Sean Whent, et al
as 16-16351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN LEE MCCULLOM
Defendant - Appellee:
SEAN WHENT, Chief of Police, STEVEN R. BANG, Detective, LEO SANCHEZ, Detective and others
McCullom v. Whent et al
as 3:2016cv01249
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee McCullom
Defendant:
Sean Whent, Steven R. Bang, Leo Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Sanchez
as 5:2015cv01082
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Leo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
McCullom v. Bang, et al
as 5:2015cv03363
Plaintiff:
Kevin McCullom
Defendant:
Steven R. Bang, Leo Sanchez, Matt Foley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11809
Plaintiff:
Leo Sanchez
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez et al v. Mocha I Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv04052
Defendant:
Abdo Alsoora, John Doe and Mocha I Corp.
Plaintiff:
Eliazar Benito and Leo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanchez et al v. Mocha I Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv04644
Plaintiff:
Leo Sanchez and Eliazar Benito
Defendant:
Mocha I Corp., Abdo Alsoora and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Chung Kao v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2011cv01899
Defendant:
M Acuna, R Ballesteros, C Bliss and others
Plaintiff:
Chung Kao
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
