Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Hutson v. Level 3 Communications Inc
as 4:2013cv00320
Plaintiff: Sanford Hutson
Defendant: Level 3 Communications Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Fed. Telecomm. Act of 1996
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Gangi
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellee: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Plaintiff: PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1102
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor: JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff / Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant / Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver, AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC and others
Dreamroom Productions, Inc. v. Level 3 Communications, Inc.
as 1:2011mc00080
Petitioner: Dreamroom Productions, Inc.
Respondent: Level 3 Communications, Inc.
In re: Level 3 Communication We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1029
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM A. POPPO
Plaintiff: ADAM SKAGGS, JOHN S. BURKE, MARILYN A. IDES and others
Defendant - Appellee: LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., KEVIN J. O'HARA, JAMES Q. CROWE and others
: , , and others
In re: SE PA Transport Auth, et al
as 09-1242
Petitioner: SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, DENNIS ELKO and DOUGLAS B. NEDRY
Respondent: WILLIAM A. POPPO, LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., KEVIN J. O'HARA and others
Ross v. Level 3 Communications, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00606
Plaintiff: Jennifer Ross
Defendant: Level 3 Communications, Inc., Kevin J. O'Hara, Eric J. Mortensen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ides v. Level 3 Communications, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00296
Plaintiff: Marilyn A. Ides
Defendant: Level 3 Communications, Inc., Kevin J. O'Hara, Eric J. Mortensen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?