Cases 1 - 10 of 177
B.J.P. v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6388
Plaintiff:
B.J.P.
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, (SCDC), By and Through Its Director, Bryan P. Stirling, SCDC DIRECTOR BRYAN P. STIRLING, in his Individual and Official Capacities, SCDC DEP. DIR. DENNIS PATTERSON, in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
Wills v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv00708
Petitioner:
Theodore Wills
Respondent:
Warden Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv00547
Petitioner:
Troy Darnell Hunter
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayers v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv01240
Petitioner:
Breon Jacoby Mayers
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Garvin v. Levern Cohen
as 23-6944
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN DWAYNE GARVIN
Respondent / Appellee:
LEVERN COHEN, Warden
Richardson v. Stirling et al
as 2:2023cv00818
Petitioner:
Andre Richardson
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel v. Cohen
as 2:2023cv01447
Petitioner:
Lucius Simuel
Respondent:
Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson, Jr v. Cohen et al
as 9:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
John Ervin Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Levern Cohen, Terrie Wallace, Consonya Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Fulton v. Cohen et al
as 5:2022cv03782
Plaintiff:
Shirley Fulton
Defendant:
Levern Cohen, Colie W Carter, III, Roosevelt S Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Peters v. Cohen
as 9:2022cv03275
Petitioner:
Donald Eugene Peters
Respondent:
Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
