Cases 1 - 10 of 915
Lancaster v. Wilson et al
as 5:2024ct03150
Plaintiff:
Milton E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Mashell L. Wilson, Timothy L. Lewis, Mr. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MEBANE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00480
Petitioner:
ANTONIO LEWIS MEBANE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Whitehurst v. Lewis et al
as 5:2024ct03136
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Timothy L. Lewis, Mashell L. Wilson and Sgt. D. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEWIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Carroll Ray Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS v. HIRSCH et al
as 5:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans
Respondent:
Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon, Stacy Eggers IV and others
Intervenor:
Philip E. Berger and Timothy K. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS v. SURBHI
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. LEWIS
Defendant:
MD JANE SURBHI and NICOLE R. RAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Hosea Loren Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Morgan v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Lewis Morgan
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
