Motor Vehicle Product Liability Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Bustamante v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2018cv01417
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, DGDG 16, LLC and DGDG 16, LLC a California Limited Liability Company doing business as Capitol Ford
Plaintiff: Miguel Vinces Bustamante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Joyce Richard v. Toyota Motor Corporation, et al
as 18-55282
: In re: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOYCE D. RICHARD
Defendant - Appellee: TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Sean Poffenbarger v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01694
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, BWM NVT Motors, BWM NVT Motors a California a Delaware Limited Liability Company doing business as Serramonte Ford and others
Plaintiff: Sean Poffenbarger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Danielle Dismone v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01657
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Vista Ford Oxnard, Vista Ford Lincoln of Oxnard, LLC a California Limited Liability Company (sued as Vista Ford Oxnard, LLC) doing business as Vista Ford Lincoln of Oxnard and others
Plaintiff: Danielle Dismone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Ali K. Alshatti v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01614
Defendant: Ford Motor Company, Sunroad Auto LLC, Sunroad Auto LLC a California Limited Liability Company doing business as Kearny Pearson Ford and Kia and others
Plaintiff: Ali K Alshatti and Ali K. Alshatti
3Rd Party Defendant: TK Holdings, Inc. and Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability
First International Bank & Trust v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2017cv01518
Defendant: FCA US LLC and FCA US LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as "Chrysler" on behalf of Chrysler Group LLC
Plaintiff: First International Bank & Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kim Ram, et al v. Ride the Ducks of Seattle, LLC, et al
as 16-35950
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIM HA RAM, Estate of through personal representative Kim Soon Wan in his representative capacity for the Estate, KIM SOON WAN, in his individual capacity and as the father of Kim Ha Ram and JEONG JU HEE, in her individual capacity and as mother of Kim Ha Ram
Defendant - Appellee: RIDE THE DUCKS OF SEATTLE, LLC, a Washington limited liability corporation and RIDE THE DUCKS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a Missouri limited liability corporation
Takata Airbag Products v. United Services Automobile Association
as 3:2016cv02642
Plaintiff: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation
Respondent: United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicolas v. Toyota Motor North America Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00845
Plaintiff: Pierre Nicolas
Defendant: Toyota Motor North America Inc. and U-Save Car Services Limited Liability Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
IN RE: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2015md02599
Defendant: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation, General Motors LLC, Esq. Sekou Gary and others
Plaintiff: Loren Petersen, Plaintiffs Lead Counsel, Bernadette Heard and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Ann Xiaoyan Chen, Kathryn Commiciotto, Lynndon Bais and others
Consolidated Defendant: Honda Engineering Co Ltd, American Honda Motor Co., Inc.,, Mazda Motor Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: Honda R & D Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation and others
Special Master: John Delionado and Ryan K Stumphauzer
Consolidated 3Rd Party Defendant: TK Holdings Inc. and DWWIII Company, Inc.
Claimant: John Randall Futch
Consolidated 3Rd Party Plaintiff: Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Cross Defendant: Roes 1-20 and Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?