Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Superb Motors Inc. et al v. Deo et al
as 2:2023cv06188
Plaintiff:
Superb Motors Inc., Team Auto Sales LLC, Robert Anthony Urrutia and others
Defendant:
Anthony Deo, Sarah Deo, Harry Thomasson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Libertas Funding, LLC v. ACM Development, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Libertas Funding, LLC
Defendant:
ACM Development, LLC, Lucid Tech LLC, Empirical Retail LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3545
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Peapack-Gladstone Bank v. Anvil Mechanical Inc et al
as 7:2021cv10834
Plaintiff:
Peapack-Gladstone Bank
Defendant:
Anvil Mechanical Inc, Daniel Leito, Anthony Ruffino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sev1Tech, LLC v. Netorian, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01500
Defendant:
Fundova, LLC, Netorian, LLC, Libertas Funding, LLC and others
Interpleader:
Sev1Tech, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Libertas Funding LLC v. Libertas Technologies Inc
as 0:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
Libertas Funding, LLC and Libertas Funding LLC
Defendant:
Libertas Technologies Inc. and Libertas Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Dottore, Receiver v. Civista Bank et al
as 1:2020cv00855
Defendant:
Joseph Plonski, Saturn Funding LLC, Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Dottore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DEWIG'S BODY SHOP, INC. v. DEWIG
as 3:2018cv00050
Interested Party:
CAN CAPITAL, INC., LIBERTAS FUNDING, LLC. and ONDECK CAPITAL
Defendant:
JOY DEWIG
Plaintiff:
DEWIG'S BODY SHOP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
