Cases 1 - 10 of 153
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY M-BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. R. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
JAMIR MITCHELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN and LIEUTENANT BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
JULIUS ALLEN
Defendant:
U/K JOHNSON CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, U/K ARNOLD LIEUTENANT and U/K VANDIVNER CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HILL
Defendant:
WARDEN RANDY IRWIN, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, SERGEANT J.T. KRAFCZYNSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. LOWE et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT LOWE, SGT. KEMP, C.O. CROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCUNE v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. MCCUNE, JR.
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. WALKER, C.O. MOHNEY, SGT. LESKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
