Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Green v. Dunn et al
as 1:2019cv01045
Defendant:
Sergeant Moore, Sergeant Dees, Warden Lightner and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Lane Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald McCauley v. Lieutenant Riley
as 11-7203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD LEE MCCAULEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT RILEY, HFDC, SERGEANT ROSEMARY SANDERS, HFDC and HEAD NURSE PAULA NLN, HFDC
Defendant:
HILL FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER, a/k/a Berkeley County Detention Center
Ronald McCauley v. Lieutenant Riley
as 11-6947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD LEE MCCAULEY
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT RILEY, HFDC, SERGEANT ROSEMARY SANDERS, HFDC and HEAD NURSE PAULA NLN, HFDC
Defendant:
HILL FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER and BERKELEY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Rodney Sansbury v. Lieutenant Riley
as 11-6474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY NEIL SANSBURY
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT RILEY
Defendant:
SANDRA HOLLAND
Cambron v. Riley et al
as 3:2010cv02334
Plaintiff:
Jason A Cambron
Defendant:
Lieutenant Riley, Sargeant Sennitt, Sargeant Sheets and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stocksdale v. Habersham et al
as 9:2010cv01718
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Stocksdale
Defendant:
Sargent Habersham, Lieutenant Riley and Cliff McElvogue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaCroix v. Habersham et al
as 9:2010cv01719
Plaintiff:
Kyle LaCroix
Defendant:
Sargent Habersham, Lieutenant Riley and Cliff McElvogue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metts v. Habersham et al
as 9:2010cv01721
Plaintiff:
Brian Metts
Defendant:
Sargent Habersham, Lieutenant Riley and Cliff McElvogue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Habersham et al
as 9:2010cv01714
Plaintiff:
Bill Stone
Defendant:
Sargent Habersham, Lieutenant Riley and Cliff McElvogue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cales v. Habersham et al
as 9:2010cv01720
Plaintiff:
Stacy W Cales
Defendant:
Sargent Habersham, Lieutenant Riley and Cliff McElvogue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
