Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Liu v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 4:2023cv05211
Plaintiff:
Shin-Lin Liu
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
United States of America v. Any and All Funds Seized from Various Accounts at Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2022cv00826
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANY AND ALL FUNDS SEIZED FROM VARIOUS ACCOUNTS AT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Sichong Wang, Xi Cheng and others
Claimant:
Xingbo Liu, Xinguo Chen, Jian Xie and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55129
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mejia v. Ke Lai Xiang Number One Restaurant Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06664
Plaintiff:
Juan Riquiac Mejia
Defendant:
Ke Lai Xiang Number One Restaurant Inc. doing business as Ke Lai Qin Live Fish and Lin Liu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
LIU v. NEW DICKSON TRADING, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv15779
Plaintiff:
JUN LIN LIU
Defendant:
NEW DICKSON TRADING LLC and NAN SHENG JIANG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Liu v. Garland
as 21-6173
Petitioner:
GUI LIN LIU
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10784
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Chen v. ABC Corporation 1-10 et al
as 1:2019cv06673
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION 1-10 d/b/a TACO TODAY, John Doe 1-10, YIMING PENG and others
Plaintiff:
Zhen Ming Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
