Cases 1 - 10 of 1,265
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Frank v. Tamer Gas Corp et al
as 1:2024cv11191
Plaintiff:
Lisa Frank,
Defendant:
Tamer Gas Corp, Giana Youssef and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Orkin v. Albert, et al
as 24-1388
Plaintiff:
WAYNE ORKIN and ARTHUR ORKIN
Defendant:
LISA SUE ALBERT and IAN ALBERT
Cross Plaintiff:
BOOST WEB SEO, INC.
Brady v. Mosca, et al
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE BRADY
Defendant:
JENI MOSCA, PAMELA MACDONALD, JEANNE KINCAID and others
Seguin v. Rhode Island Department of Human Services, et al
as 24-1313
Plaintiff:
MARY SEGUIN
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, in its official capacity, RHODE ISLAND OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, in its official capacity, GERO MEYERSIEK, in his individual and official capacity and others
Bauersachs v. Federal Reserve Board of Governors et al
as 1:2024cv10869
Plaintiff:
Mark Bauersachs
Defendant:
Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Jerome H Powell, Phillip N. Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Crafford v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10772
Plaintiff:
Lisa Crafford
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SHAW et al v. FADDEN
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SHAW and LISA SHAW
Defendant:
MATTHEW FADDEN doing business as CUSTOM CARE CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
