Cases 41 - 50 of 6,078
Bagal v. Sawant, et al.
as 24-1488
Plaintiff:
ABHIJIT BAGAL
Defendant:
KSHAMA SAWANT, in her official and individual capacities as Councilmember, District 3, of the Seattle City Council, LISA HERBOLD, in her official and individual capacities as Councilmember, District 1, of the Seattle City Council and BRUCE HARRELL, in his official and individual capacities as the Mayor of the City of Seattle
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Freeman v. Sansom
as 24-668
Plaintiff:
LISA FREEMAN
Defendant:
SCOTT SANSOM, Chief of Police, JOSEPH FICACELLI, Police Lieutenant and TOWN OF EAST HARTFORD
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Marquez v. Silver
as 24-650
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS MARQUEZ
Defendant:
GEORGE SILVER, individually, LAUREN DESOLE, individually, LAWRENCE MARKS, individually and others
Warren v. City of Henderson, et al.
as 24-1362
Plaintiff:
ALLANNA WARREN
Defendant:
CITY OF HENDERSON, CITY OF HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOLLIE CHADWICK, Henderson Police Department Chief of Police and others
Augustus v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-1367
Plaintiff:
KARL AUGUSTUS
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, MICHEL MOORE, Chief, ROBERT OLMOS, Sergeant and others
Sivak v. Fitzgerald, et al.
as 24-1360
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
LISA FITZGERALD, BRIDGET S. BADE, CIRCUIT JUDGE, KENNETH K. LEE, CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Perez v. Lorman, et al.
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE PEREZ and Lisa Marie Belyew
Defendant:
MATT BEAUCHAMP, LARRY LORMAN and COLUSA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Globokar v. Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01723
Plaintiff:
William Globokar
Defendant:
Hess Corporation, James H. Quigley, Terrence J. Checki and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
