Cases 71 - 80 of 467
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Scott v. Harven A. Crouse Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Dustin Gene Scott
Defendant:
Harven A. Crouse Detention Center, Bill Beam, Vida Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY - EL v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN PERRY - EL
Defendant:
BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CAMERAN WITT, KIMBERLY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisi v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lisi
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benzing v. USAA Officer Severance Plan
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Lisa Benzing
Defendant:
USAA Officer Severance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Tolbert v. King et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Shantal Tolbert
Defendant:
Willye Mai King, Richelieu Dennis, Yende Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Massey v. Harris et al
as 5:2022ct03111
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Lee Massey
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Lisa Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
