Cases 81 - 90 of 272
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alvarado Martinez v. Saul
as 3:2019cv01017
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew W. Saul
Plaintiff:
Nila Lisa Alvarado Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Pasqualucci v. Global Satellite Computer Systems Operators et al
as 3:2019cv01005
Defendant:
Siri/Cirrus-XM, Bollywood/Univison and Global Satellite Computer Systems Operators
Plaintiff:
Lisa Pasqualucci
Gulley v. Bujnicki et al
as 3:2019cv00903
Plaintiff:
Chaz Gulley
Defendant:
Ackerman, Hollister, Nick Rodriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corson v. Chalk
as 3:2019cv00836
Defendant:
Lynn Chalk and Lynn Chalk doing business as Lynn Chalk Designs
Plaintiff:
Lisa Corson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Velasco v. Semple et al
as 3:2019cv00811
Defendant:
Moore, Rembish, Makay and others
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Velasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pasqualucci v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 3:2019cv00582
Defendant:
RCA TV Radio Media, Agricultural Dept, Global Internet Broadcasters and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Pasqualucci
Vivo v. Watson et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Defendant:
Bryan Viger, Joslyn Cruz, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John Vivo, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Konspore et al v. USA et al
as 3:2019cv00161
Defendant:
Charles A. Curley, Sondra R. Peterson, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Konspore and Matthew Konspore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Connecticut State Police Union et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2019cv00037
Defendant:
Benjamin Barnes, Lisa Grasso Egan, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff:
Connecticut State Police Union and John Castiline
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
