Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morse v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03563
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lisa Morse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morse v. Quinn
as 19-3767
Defendant / Appellee:
Street gang associates, Ronzell Stamps, Bobby Kirven and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Morse
Morse v. Quinn et al
as 6:2019cv06745
Defendant:
Ronzell Stamps, Patrick Antonio Napier, accomplices of stated in complaint and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Morse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Morse v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 19-2433
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Morse
Morse v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv06500
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lisa Morse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Morse v. Accordino
as 19-689
Defendant / Appellee:
Burger King Corporation, Daniel Accordino and Burger King Management, Mt. Hope Ave.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Morse
Morse v. Accordino et al
as 6:2019cv06142
Defendant:
Daniel Accordino, Burger King and Burger King Management, Mt. Hope Ave.
Plaintiff:
Lisa Morse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morse v. Stamps
as 19-261
Defendant / Appellee:
Mr. Bobby Kirven, Ronzell Stamps and Patrick Antonio Napier
Defendant:
Street gang associates, Ronzell Stamp's relatives, Doris Roman and Lisa Morse's relatives whom associate with defendants and others
Plaintiff:
Mahina Napier and Nebka Napier
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Morse
Morse v. Stamps street gang
as 19-125
Defendant / Appellee:
Patrick Antonio Napier, Ronzell Stamps, street gang and Bobby Kirven, street gangs place of employment
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Morse
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
