Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Iosilevich v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv06505
Plaintiff:
Ilya Feliksovich Iosilevich
Defendant:
United States, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Precision Metals Corp. et al v. U.S. Department of Defense et al
as 2:2022cv03761
Plaintiff:
Precision Metals Corp., Anthony C. Figlozzi and Thomas J. Figlozzi
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin III, U.S. Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 jr Judicial Review
Stone Jr., Esq. et al v. Austin III et al
as 2:2021cv04822
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Stone Jr., Esq. and House of Stone 76
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin III, General David H. Berger and Joseph Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Darnis et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv01171
Defendant:
John H. Walker, Carrier Global Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Maurer, Christopher Doot, David Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Fava v. Ward et al
as 9:2020cv00156
Defendant:
Joseph T. Ward, Jr., Ryan A. Albright, Lieutenant Lloyd J. Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
James P. Fava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00318
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Heller v. Goldin Restructing Fund, L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv03704
Plaintiff:
Lloyd J. Heller and Lloyd J. Heller
Defendant:
Goldin Restructing Fund, L.P., Goldin Capital Partners, L.P., Goldin Capital Partners Management, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
