Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02588
Plaintiff:
JARED Lloyd MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alabama One Credit Union v. Toppins et al
as 7:2018cv02102
Intervenor:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul Toppins, National Credit Union Administration, Dick Holley and others
Plaintiff:
Alabama One Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Russell Halbrook, et al v. Mallinckrodt, LLC, et al
as 17-1452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Russell Halbrook, Decedent, through his heir Edith Halbrook, Sandra Cattoor, Decedent, through her heir Dale Cattoor, Frances Bathe, Decedent, through her heir George Bathe and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Mallinckrodt, LLC and Cotter Corporation
Moore v. Mallinckrodt LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00248
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Moore
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt LLC and Cotter Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Smith
as 16-6112
Petitioner:
In re: FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Respondent:
RAE HOWELL, Nurse, LLOYD MOORE, Doctor, MICHAEL CASTEEL, Officer and others
Moore v. Besette et al
as 4:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Moore
Defendant:
Besette and Corizon Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haselby et al v. Mallinckrodt Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00964
Plaintiff:
James Haselby , Paula Bowman , Thomas Grandstaff and others
Defendant:
Mallinckrodt Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC and Cotter Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Howell et al
as 5:2014cv01374
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Smith
Defendant:
Rae Howell, Lloyd Moore, Michael Casteel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v Howell et al
as 4:2014cv00694
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Smith
Defendant:
Rae Howell, Lloyd Moore and Micheal Casteel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
