Cases 21 - 30 of 1,132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Houston v. Johnson, et al.
as 24-267
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff
Lombardo v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Jane Lombardo
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hafner v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2023cv02141
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Joseph M Lombardo, Aaron Ford and Francisco V. Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2023cv02135
Petitioner:
Ammar Harris
Respondent:
Joe Lombardo and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Landendorf et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Roy Robert Landendorf, Cornell Knox, Shanti Koko and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals AMericas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Stanford v. Lombardo et al
as 3:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Trudy Stanford
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Jack Robb and Rob Boehmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01573
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Solomon v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 23-4166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEBYOU SOLOMON
Defendant / Appellee:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN PELLETIER, RICHARD E. MAUPIN and others
King, et al. v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.
as 23-4168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACEY KING
Plaintiff:
LEI KING
Defendant / Appellee:
LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALEJANDRA ZAMBRANO and LARRY HADFIELD
Defendant:
JOE LOMBARDO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
