Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Odem v. Felts et al
as 4:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jack Odem, III
Defendant:
John Felts, Andy Shock, Lona McCastlain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lona v. Edge
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lona
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gardner v. Bradley et al
as 4:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Avery Lee Gardner
Defendant:
Q Bradley, Andy Shock, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrance Proctor v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction, et al
as 21-2114
Defendant / Appellee:
Benny Magness, Member, Board of Corrections, in his Official and Individual Capacities, James B. Depriest, In his Official and Individual Capacities, Lona McCastlain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrance Proctor
Wood v. Felts et al
as 2:2020cv02216
Defendant:
Jerry Riley, Brooke Cummings, Lona McCastlin and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Togo Wood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Felts et al
as 4:2020cv01388
Defendant:
Jerry Riley, Lona McCastlin, Abraham Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Togo Wood, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lona v. Bank of America N.A.
as 4:2020cv00725
Plaintiff:
Gabriel G Lona
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
Proctor v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 4:2020cv00847
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Benny Magness, James Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Proctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klingensmith v. Taylor et al
as 6:2019cv06126
Defendant:
Jerry Riley, Captain Joshua Blanton, Andy Shock and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Klingensmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00823
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
