Cases 51 - 60 of 4,379
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-17347
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SANCHEZ v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2017cv00215
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Percy Tucker v. Loretta Lynch
as 17-7392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY JAMES TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, HARRY W. ATKINSON, Complex Warden and others
Percy Tucker v. Loretta Lynch
as 17-7393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PERCY JAMES TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons, HARRY W. ATKINSON, Complex Warden and others
Frederick Hamilton Banks v. Charles Ratledge
as 17-7355
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES RATLEDGE, MARK HORNAK, DAVID HICTON and others
Duane Letroy Berry v. J. C. Holland
as 17-7348
Petitioner - Appellant:
DUANE LETROY BERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
J. C. HOLLAND, Warden and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Vandivere, et al v. Loretta E. Lynch, et al
as 17-5211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Dow Vandivere and Jon Karl Thompson
Defendant - Appellee:
Loretta E. Lynch, Eric H. Holder, Jr., Thomas R. Kane, Acting Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Inocente Morales v. Neil Elk
as 17-7091
Petitioner - Appellant:
INOCENTE ORLANDO MONTANO MORALES
Respondent - Appellee:
NEIL ELKS, USM SCOTT PARKER and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
