Cases 1 - 10 of 5,985
Courville v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Courville
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Karla Bringedahl, Dale Blackard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Nortrick v. Hooper
as 24-30274
Petitioner:
Roy Van Nortrick
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Calloway v. Terrebonne Parish Correctional Justice Complex et al
as 2:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Randell Simmons Calloway
Defendant:
Terrebonne Parish Correctional Justice Complex, Terrebonne Parish Correctional Justice Complex Medical Department, Louisiana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
Philip Anthony
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Louisiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sparkman v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Nakeith C Sparkman
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mischler v. Hooper
as 24-30231
Petitioner:
Dennis Mischler
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Ricks v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grace v. Hooper
as 24-30218
Petitioner:
Jessie J. Grace, III
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Edwards v. Scott
as 24-30219
Petitioner:
Antoine Edwards
Respondent:
Bradley Scott, Tracey Flemming Davillier, Theoplus Kent and others
Johnson v. State of Louisiana
as 24-30213
Plaintiff:
Terry Michael Johnson
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
