Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ortiz v. Lovett
as 5:2022cv00323
Petitioner:
Smirna Ortiz
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ross v. Ross et al
as 6:2022cv00228
Defendant:
Renfro Lovett, Sharon Ross, Shelba Dean Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ross
May et al v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Randy May, Betty May and Amanda Weeks
Defendant:
J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and Lonnie B. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Asher et al v. Clay County Board of Education et al
as 6:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Clay County Board of Education, CCBOE, Mark Hoskins and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Asher, Shawn Smith, Carol Jean Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Hamblin v. Elliotte et al
as 6:2020cv00245
Defendant:
Logan Howell, Dackery Larkey, Derrek Lovett and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley L. Hamblin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sigrist v. Claud et al
as 5:2020cv00096
Plaintiff:
Kacy Lee Sigrist
Defendant:
Slade McCuiston, Josh Lovett and Ken Claud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaMonda v. Quintana et al
as 5:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Clarence Keith Lamonda
Defendant:
Francisco J. Quintana, Donald Murphy, S. Whitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Goddard v. Alexakos et al
as 5:2016cv00215
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Goddard
Defendant:
Nick Alexakos, Thomas Caldwell, Dave Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Lovette v. Bowen et al
as 3:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Steven Lovette
Defendant:
Neil Bowen, Dan Miller, M. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins et al v. Daymar Colleges Group, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wiggins , Jason West , Joseph McConnell and others
Defendant:
Daymar Colleges Group, LLC , Daymar Learning of Paducah, Inc , Daymar Learning of Ohio, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
