Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Cicchiello v. Lovett
as 1:2022cv01979
Petitioner:
Joan Cicchiello
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
REED v. HELENIHI et al
as 2:2022cv03576
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
ERICK HELENIHI doing business as U.S. PAROLE EXAMINER, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA doing business as U.S. PATROLE DIRECTOR, JEQUAN JACKSON doing business as U.S. PAROLE ANALYST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker et al v. Digby et al
as 3:2020cv00762
Defendant:
Jen Digby, Howdy Shell, Jody Fognani and others
Plaintiff:
William Walker, Cameron Lovett, Dwayne Gooden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovett v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2019cv01125
Defendant:
Loreen Cummings, Mari Finnon, Isaac Hebron and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lovett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIEHL v. CITY OF JOHNSTOWN et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SIEHL
Defendant:
CITY OF JOHNSTOWN , CAMBRIA COUNTY, DAVID TULOWITZKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVETT v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv00996
Plaintiff:
FAITH U. LOVETT
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDAVISON v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv03919
Plaintiff:
LOVETT MCDAVISON
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LOVETT et al v. CONNECT AMERICA.COM
as 2:2014cv02596
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LOVETT , IDA A. WILLIAMS and TRACY L. ROMANS
Defendant:
CONNECT AMERICA.COM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PHILLIPS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2013cv06683
Plaintiff:
IRVIN PHILLIPS , WENDELL CASON , LOVETT PURNELL and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
