Cases 1 - 10 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Casanova v. Pfizer and Affiliates et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
Pfizer and Affiliates, Actalent Temporary Agency and Affiliates, GRAIL INC. and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ashley Casanova v. Joe Biden
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY CASANOVA
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Roger Morse v. VDOC
as 23-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER LEE MORSE
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HAROLD W. CLARKE, in his individual and official capacity as Director for the Virginia Department of Corrections, PATRICIA S. BISHOP, In her individual and official capacity as Director for the Virginia Retirement System and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Casanova v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Federal Government, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
