Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Ketzbeau v. Ivy et al
as 4:2024cv11006
Plaintiff:
Jesse I Ketzbeau
Defendant:
Curtis Ivy, Jr., Frances K. Behm, Nancy Abraham and others
Lowe v. LNU et al
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kay Lowe, Jr.
Defendant:
Michelle LNU and Monica Tillery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Artis et al
as 2:2024cv10795
Plaintiff:
John David Lay
Defendant:
Fredeane Artis, Walker, Kent and others
Crenshaw v. Warden, Grafton Correctional Institution, et al.
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Charles Crenshaw
Defendant:
Warden, Grafton Correctional Institution, Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution and Warden, FCI Petersburg Low
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Anderson County Detention Facility
as 3:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Benny Chris Lowe
Defendant:
Anderson County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, et al v. Roadway Inn, et al
as 3:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith, MShafer@FBI.gov, Mr. f/n/u Reed and others
Defendant:
Roadway Inn, Lowes, Walgreens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shine-Johnson et al v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv03236
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Shine-Johnson and Richard Stanton Whitman
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Marc Bratton, Eddy Bobby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Milous Brown
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ernie L Moore, Brian J Niceswanger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lowe v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Asata D Lowe
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lowe v. Parris
as 3:2022mc00018
Petitioner:
Asata D Lowe
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
