Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Lowe v. Heisner
as 2:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Lanalsikov Lowe
Respondent:
R.A. Heisner and RA Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Foley v. Koumal et al
as 4:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Matthew V Foley, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Koumal, Scott Lowing, Linda Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00834
Plaintiff:
Randon L Miller
Defendant:
Ryan Lowing, Michael Malecha, Christian Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe v. Lothrop
as 2:2020cv02487
Plaintiff:
Lanalsikov Lowe
Defendant:
W Lothrop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Matkin et al
as 3:2020cv08214
Defendant:
Joe Shelley, Unknown Matkin, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cota v. Mayer City Justice Court et al
as 3:2019cv08349
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mayer City Justice Court, Bill Rummer and others
Petitioner:
Jacob Anthony Cota
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, John Lowe, Yavapai, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valero #085430 v. Lowe et al
as 2:2019cv05584
Defendant:
Unknown Lowe, Scott Blum and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Parry Raymond Valero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason #240482 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04987
Defendant:
Unknown Whiting, Nichole Johnson, Unknown Vance and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Sterling Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowe #312000 v. Hacker-Agnew et al
as 2:2018cv03151
Petitioner:
Derrick Damarian Lowe
Respondent:
Carla Hacker-Agnew and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez-Torres et al v. Rosales et al
as 2:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramon Martinez-Torres and Araceli Toruga
Defendant:
Richard Lee Rosales, Unknown Rosales, Scott Nikolaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
