Cases 11 - 20 of 183
Luckey v. Godwin et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Tyran Luckey
Defendant:
Kristy Godwin, Southern Health Partner, Elizabeth Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Lowe's Home Center, LLC (CONSENT)
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Palmer
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Agro Holdings LLC et al v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Agro Holdings LLC, Alameda Aggregates LLC, Aquatic Creek LLC and others
Defendant:
Arden Row Assets LLC, United States of America, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lowe v. Jenkins et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Phillippi Sultan Lowe
Defendant:
Jonathan Jenkins, Mark Vermillion and Misty Vermillion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Lowes Home Improvement Corp
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones
Defendant:
Lowes Home Improvement Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lowe v. Tweezerman International, LLC
as 1:2021cv00513
Plaintiff:
Emily Leanne Lowe
Defendant:
Tweezerman International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Myers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00343
Defendant:
Larry Lowe, Officer Jones, Walter Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Tristan Wayne Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Robinett et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv01058
Defendant:
J. R. Gaines, Gregory Oswald Griffin, Sr., Tiffany B. McCord and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
