Cases 31 - 40 of 219
LOWE v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
JERRY KAY LOWE, JR
Defendant:
RULE, DUETSH and FOOD SERVICE STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LOWE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. LOWE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DUSTY RUSSELL, C. HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE 1-8 v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1-8
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DAVID LOWE, Unknown Jail Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
JERRY KAY LOWE, JR
Defendant:
RULE, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. RULE et al
as 1:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
JERRY KAY LOWE, JR
Defendant:
RULE, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Rule et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kay Lowe, Jr
Defendant:
Rule, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and David Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOMER ET AL V. NOEL ET AL
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Coomer, tarin Cox, Lindsey Culver and others
Defendant:
Jamie Noel, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, David J Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENSON v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01100
Plaintiff:
SHELBY JENSON
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC, THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC and SCOTTS LIVE GOODS HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LOWE v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
EDDIE J. LOWE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bassett v. Burns et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Adella Bassett
Defendant:
Charles Burns and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
