Cases 1 - 10 of 39
LOWE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00236
Petitioner:
ROY ANTRON LOWE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
LOWE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00564
Plaintiff:
CHAD E LOWE and CHAD E. LOWE
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and KILOLO KIJAKAZE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
ELFONT v. SWIFT RESPONSE, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D. ELFONT
Cross Claimant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Defendant:
APOLLO AEROSOL INDUSTRIES, LLC and PLZ AEROSCIENCE CORPORATION
Cross Defendant:
SWIFT RESPONSE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CANNON et al v. AUTOMONEY, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00877
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER TAYLOR, JULIA HARRISON, BRIAN BREVARD and others
Defendant:
AUTOMONEY, INC. and AUTOMONEY NORTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLSON, ET AL. v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00490
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN NICHOLSON, ET AL., EUELL STANFIELD, ANGELIQUE GRAY and others
Counter Defendant:
DOMINIQUE BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWE v. USA
as 1:2019cv00448
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ROY ANTRON LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
