Cases 71 - 80 of 240
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lowndes County Georgia v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op45835
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Lowndes County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHONTZ v. LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 7:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
JAMIE STEVEN SHONTZ
Defendant:
JONATHAN MUNSON, LOWNDES COUNTY SHERIFF MEDICAL STAFF, JASON CLIFTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Crowder v. Lowndes County Superior Court
as 18-12715
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD CROWDER
Respondent - Appellee:
LOWNDES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as GAM/7:18-cv-00090
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA LP , PURDUE PHARMA INC , THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY INC and others
Plaintiff:
LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA
LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA v. PURDUE PHARMA LP et al
as 7:2018cv00090
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA INC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROWDER v. LOWNDES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 7:2018cv00065
Petitioner:
DONALD CROWDER
Respondent:
LOWNDES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sudduth v. Lowndes County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mose Lee Sudduth, Jr.
Defendant:
Lowndes County, Mississippi, Roger Coleman and North Atlantic Security Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lowndes County, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 1:2018op45203
Plaintiff:
Lowndes County, Alabama
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
