Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Wheat, Brandon Loyd v. Snyder
as 2:2024cv14082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Loyd Wheat
Defendant:
Sheriff William L Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitworth v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00881
Petitioner:
Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loyd v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00235
Petitioner:
Jeremy W. Loyd
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GALINDO v. HAYWOOD et al
as 4:2019cv00376
Defendant:
DAVIS, HAYWOOD, LOYD and others
Plaintiff:
LAZARO HELIBERTO GALINDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRVIN v. CALDWELL et al
as 3:2019cv00021
Defendant:
LT. Loyd, Edginald Gibbons, Deputy Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE LEWIS IRVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Turman et al(INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Scotts Racks, Andalusia Health Care, Johnny Loyd and others
Plaintiff:
Scotty Devon Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRVIN v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2019cv00004
Defendant:
JANE DOE, EDGINALD GIBBONS, LAKISHA FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE LEWIS IRVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyde v. Brown et al
as 1:2018cv00244
Plaintiff:
Joe Loyde
Defendant:
Deveron Brown and Ruby Salters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drummond v. Patrick et al
as 6:2018cv00787
Petitioner:
Kenneth Loyd Drummond
Respondent:
Jimmy Patrick and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Southwick v. Bolling
as 5:2018cv00719
Petitioner:
Joshua Loyd Southwick
Respondent:
Leon Bolling
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
