Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SMITH v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
DASHAAN R. SMITH
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFELTER, SGT. SIPES, SGT. VERESHACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANT v. PIRL et al
as 2:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GRANT
Defendant:
C.O. PIRL, C.O. JOHN DOE, LT. HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01555
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FORMER COMMISSIONER CHARLES RAMSEY, POLICE CAPT./LT. JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ONYIAH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01556
Plaintiff:
OBINA ONYIAH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, FORMER COMMISSIONER CHARLES RAMSEY, POLICE CAPT./LT. JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Weaver et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mark Clark
Defendant:
J. Weaver, Sgt. John Doe Smouse, Lt. John Doe Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PAYNE v. MEADE et al
as 2:2021cv03387
Plaintiff:
ADDAN PAYNE
Defendant:
DAVID MEADE, LT. DOE JOHN, JOHN 1-10 DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HECKER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Defendant:
SEARGENT WHARTON, JIMMY KIMMEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R HECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURK v. BUDD et al
as 2:2021cv00929
Defendant:
MS. BUDD, DR. CASSIDY, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv05365
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Joshua Bennett, OFFICER Kyle Bobiy and others
Debtor In Possession:
Kyle Bobiy
Plaintiff:
RYAN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
