Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Al-Haqq v. Mims et al
as 2:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Mr Mims, Ms. Butler, Staci Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Findley v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv01916
Plaintiff:
Darrell Allen Findley
Defendant:
Anderson County Detention Center, Ashlee Rogers, Cpt. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Warrick et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv03326
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Ocean, Correctional Officer Sgt. Lockemy, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
James Hardin, John State, David Warrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Chisolm v. Thompson et al
as 4:2015cv01806
Plaintiff:
DonSurvi Chisolm
Defendant:
Warden Thompson, Capt Brighhart, Lt Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Kershaw CI et al
as 2:2014cv00970
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen Martin
Defendant:
Cecilia Reynolds, Associate Warden Stonebreaker, Lisa Engram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera v. Drew et al
as 5:2012cv01002
Plaintiff:
Daniel Herrera
Defendant:
Darleen Drew, SIS Lt Brawley, Gerald DelRey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Drew et al
as 2:2011cv00654
Plaintiff:
Barry Lee Thompson
Defendant:
Darlen Drew, Lt Miller and Capt DaleRay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillie v. Burtt et al
as 0:2009cv01422
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hillie
Defendant:
Stan Burtt, McKeither Bodison, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jenkins et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv01236
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jenkins, Christopher Jenkins, Othelle Rhue and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, John Ozmint, James Slaigh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
