Cases
Solomon v. Frederickson, et al
as 22-1956
Plaintiff / Appellant: DENNIS J. SOLOMON
Defendant / Appellee: FRANK FREDERICKSON, in his personal capacity and official capacity, PHILIP MAGNUSON, in his personal capacity and official capacity, MICHAEL KENNEFICK, in his personal capacity and official capacity and others
Defendant: ROBERT C. LAWLESS, NATASHA C. LISMAN, DOUGLAS WOLF and others
Solomon v. Frederickson, et al
as 22-1426
Plaintiff / Appellant: DENNIS J. SOLOMON
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT C. LAWLESS, NATASHA C. LISMAN, DOUGLAS WOLF and others
Defendant: CATHOLIC CHURCH OF AMERICA, ST JUDE/ALSAC, VINCENT LECLERC and others
Solomon v. Fredrickson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv11894
Defendant: Joseph Biden, USC(University of Southern California), Michael Waterstone and others
Plaintiff: Pro Se Party Dennis Solomon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinney v. Lavin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv03817
Plaintiff: Charles Kinney
Defendant: Luis A. Lavin, Roger W. Boren and DOES 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kinney v. Boren et al
as 4:2014cv03816
Plaintiff: Charles Kinney
Defendant: Roger W. Boren, Luis A. Lavin and DOES 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Charles Kinney v. State Bar of California et al
as 2:2014cv01591
Defendant: Shahin Behdin, Roger W Boren, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff: Charles Kinney
Charles Kinney v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 13-17187
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LUIS A. LAVIN, California Superior Court Judge and ROGER W. BOREN, California Appeals Justice
Kinney v. State Bar of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01396
Plaintiff: Charles Kinney
Defendant: State Bar of California , City of Los Angeles, Luis A. Lavin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?