Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Vargas v. Pierre et al
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Edwin F. Vargas
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, Jill Cuffaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Pierre et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thompson
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, Jill Cuffaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Pierre et al
as 1:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Kani C. Little
Defendant:
Lionel Pierre, Roger Lucas, LaTonya Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. SOLOMAN
as 5:2022cv02647
Petitioner:
SANTOS LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SOLOMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREEN v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2022cv02504
Defendant:
SHERIL HAMILTON, LUIS RODRIGUEZ, SHERAL HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff:
RASHON GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Wassel v. Torbeck et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Wassel, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Richard Torbeck, Gregory H. Chelak, Raymond J. Tonkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson et al v. Khox et al
as 3:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
Larry Shaw, Juan Reyes, John Filer and others
Defendant:
Director, SCI-Dallas Security Administration, Superintendent Ransom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2019cv00360
Defendant:
LUIS RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, VLADIMIR MECHKOVA and others
Plaintiff:
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Baltazar
as 1:2017cv01852
Petitioner:
Luis Rodriguez
Respondent:
Baltazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
