Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10688
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Kanaly v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv08839
Defendant:
Alison Loehnis, Meghan Frank, Isabel Mahe and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Kanaly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Wong v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv08752
Defendant:
Teri List, Alison Loehnis, Emily White and others
Plaintiff:
James Wong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Holtz v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv08572
Defendant:
Alison Loehnis, David Mussafer, Michael Casey and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Holtz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
MUSZYNSKI v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv08507
Defendant:
Isabel Mahe, Kathryn Henry, Jon McNeill and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MUSZYNSKI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Bhavsar v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv08405
Defendant:
Jon McNeill, Isabel Mahe, Shane Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv04052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Andra Group, LP v. Lululemon Athletica, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00132
Defendant:
Lululemon Athletica, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andra Group, LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patel v. Lululemon Athletica Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06033
Defendant:
Calvin McDonald, Meghan Frank and Lululemon Athletica Inc.
Plaintiff:
Prathik Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Gyani v. Lululemon USA Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv22651
Plaintiff:
Amandeep Gyani
Defendant:
Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Lululemon USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
