Cases 1 - 10 of 4,379
Klotz v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv01256
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Wendel Klotz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thain v. Lumpkin
as 24-20465
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Blake Allen Thain
Powell v. Hodgkins et al
as 4:2024cv03962
Respondent:
Jenny Hodgkins, L. Banda, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Petitioner:
Michael Allan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Enriquez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50822
Respondent:
United States Immigration Department (ICE) Officers, Waco Police Department Officers & Probation Officer and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Enriquez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50821
Defendant:
FNU Monroe, Warden CT Terrel Unit, Mark E. Parker, Mail Room Off or Staff, CT Terrell Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Taylor v. Lumpkin County Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00241
Defendant:
Lumpkin County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelcastre v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03988
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Esteban Pelcastre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shafer v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv03944
Defendant:
Davidson, Bryan Collier, Ebenezer Olowomeye and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Scott Shafer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00549
Respondent:
Major Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Reginald Ferlandus Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lumpkin v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00721
Petitioner:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
