Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jacobson v. O'BRYANT et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
WILLIAM O'BRYANT, Deputy Lusk, Deputy Chief Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Cassandra Johnson, Joseph Michael Willoughby, Jonathan W Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson v. O'Bryant et al
as 4:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
O'Bryant and Sgt. Lusk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Howell et al
as 7:2019cv01391
Defendant:
Pastor Chris Hodges, Sgt. Brown, Sheriff Denis Green and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Butler et al v. Madison County District Attorney and Staff et al
as 5:2011cv01728
Plaintiff:
James L. Butler, Sr. and James L Butler, Jr
Defendant:
Madison County District Attorney and Staff , Alabama Securities Commission, Cristopher Putnam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RBC Bank (USA) v. Landreth et al
as 1:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
RBC Bank (USA)
Defendant:
Cleveland L. Landreth and J. Alan Lusk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caffey v. Alabama Supreme Court et al
as 2:2010cv03050
Plaintiff:
Sherryl Snodgrass Caffey
Defendant:
Alabama Supreme Court, Sue Bell Cobb, Champ Lyons, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanderson v. Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission et al
as 2:2010cv00878
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Sanderson
Defendant:
Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission, Montgomery County Jail, Robert E. Luske, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
