Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00038
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Johnson, Victor Jones, David Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Lusk v. Peppers et al
as 8:2021cv01976
Defendant:
Chris Merchant, United States Postal Service, April Peppers and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Lusk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv03112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ward v. Lusk et al
as 6:2019cv01074
Defendant:
Martin Transportation System Inc and Geraldine Marie Lusk
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lusk v. Garcia et al
as 8:2018cv02694
Defendant:
Jose Aurelio Reyes Garcia and CYS Logistics LLC
Plaintiff:
Jacob RC J. R. Lusk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Camden v. Greenville, City of et al
as 6:2014cv04554
Plaintiff:
Steven Blair Camden
Defendant:
Greenville, City of, Greenville Police Department, Officer Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00845
Plaintiff:
Don Boyd
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Supercenter Inc, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kenyon, Lusk, Anderson et al
as 8:2010cv00930
Plaintiff:
Danny Rayburn Smith
Defendant:
Kenyon, Lusk, Anderson and Robert Lusk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Lusk v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2007cv01926
Plaintiff:
Eloise Jane Lusk
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Young v. Lusk et al
as 3:2007cv01333
Plaintiff:
Cleophus Young
Defendant:
Mr Lusk, Mr Ashline, C Cowin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
