Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Barbosa v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., et al
as 19-1896
Plaintiff:
MARK ANDERSON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and DOUGLASS BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
LUSTIG GLASER & WILSON, P.C., SCHREIBER/COHEN, LLC and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACKELINE BARBOSA, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv10002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv40072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. Lustig Glaser & Wilson, P.C., et al
as 16-1076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
LUSTIG GLASER & WILSON, P.C., DEREK S. ROGERS, KENNETH C. WILSON and others
Defendant:
CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv13673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv40081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Veal v. Portfolio Recovery, Inc., et al
as 15-1490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL VEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
PORTFOLIO RECOVERY, INC., PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, KENNETH C. WILSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
