Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Young v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Luther Carl Young and Luther Young
Defendant:
Ron Neal and Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR-BEY v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. TAYLOR-BEY, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, KALYUZHNY, DIMITRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PITTMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02560
Plaintiff:
LUTHER D. PITTMAN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brostoski v. Luther Logistic Transportation, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Peggy J Brostoski
Defendant:
Luther Logistic Transportation, LLC and Shannon L Ludwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUDSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01312
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
LUTHER HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Eric S Davis, John H Davis and Shelia D Davis
Defendant:
EDWARD L ALLEY, ROY MOORE, DOUGLAS L PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
LUTHER v. HARRISON COUNTY JAIL
as 4:2020cv00021
Defendant:
HARRISON COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LUTHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LUTHER v. RUST et al
as 1:2020cv00083
Defendant:
B. RUST, B. GAYTAN and J. MATLOCK
Plaintiff:
JESSE A. LUTHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVES v. WILSON et al
as 1:2019cv04567
Defendant:
MARK LUTHER, JOHN VAHLE, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK D RIVES, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rives v. Wilson et al
as 3:2019cv01025
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Mark Luther, John Vahle, Marion County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Frank D Rives, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
