Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Clark v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Luther Clark
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
WARE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00300
Petitioner:
LUTHER ALAN WARE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Satterfield v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2022hc02212
Petitioner:
Luther Earl Satterfield
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022hc02174
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
RATLEDGE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LUTHER RATLEDGE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Downs v. USA
as 1:2021cv00321
Petitioner:
William Luther Downs, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gayles-El v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Devon A. Gayles-El
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Todd Ishee, Erik A. Hooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WARE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00699
Plaintiff:
LUTHER ALAN WARE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Truist Financial Corporation, as plan sponsor, administrator and fiduciary of the Truist Financial Corporation Health Care Plan v. Garner et al
as 4:2021cv00086
Defendant:
Ricci Law Firm, P.A., Luther David Garner and Kristin G. Oakley
Plaintiff:
Truist Financial Corporation, as plan sponsor, administrator and fiduciary of the Truist Financial Corporation Health Care Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RATLEDGE v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01001
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LUTHER RATLEDGE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
