Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McCullough v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00232
Plaintiff:
Alexander McCullough
Defendant:
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. and Sunglass Hut Trading, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sevilla v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc An Ohio Corporation.
as 1:2013cv13869
Plaintiff:
David Sevilla
Defendant:
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc An Ohio Corporation.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Luxottica Retail North America Inc. v. Westmain 2000, L.L.C.
as 1:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Retail North America Inc.
Defendant:
Westmain 2000, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. v. Vision Plus et al
as 1:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Vision Plus and Robert Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. v. CAS-MAN, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00374
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.
Defendant:
CAS-MAN, Inc. and Lolita Padilla Maningas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. v. JLI Optical, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.
Defendant:
JLI Optical, Inc. and James G Cummings
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
