Cases 21 - 30 of 118
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00805
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Patricia Maniaci v. Lyft, Inc.
as 23-55294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA A. MANIACI and PATRICIA ANN MANIACI I
Defendant / Appellee:
LYFT, INC.
CT Belt-Wright v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc., CT Belt-Wright, U-Haul Co. of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hayden v. Farrell et al
as 3:2023cv05168
Plaintiff:
Kellon J. Hayden and Kellon Hayden
Defendant:
Michael Farrell, MD Jane Doe, Hertz Vehicles Llc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Patricia A. Maniaci v. Lyft Inc.
as 5:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Maniaci
Defendant:
Lyft Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Lyft, Inc.,
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bell
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv09345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hardison v. Castro et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hardison
Defendant:
Paula Andrea Bedoya Castro and Lyft, Inc. doing business as Lyft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Not Used
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bell
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litigation
as 4:2019cv02690
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Brian Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Matias Malig, as Trustee for the Malig Family Trust
Petitioner:
Harold Tholen, Deep Dinesh Patel, Rakesh Khanna and others
Interested Party:
Frederic Lande, Palm Bay Police & Firefighters' Pension Fund and Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
