Cases 11 - 20 of 62
FLOYD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2023cv03499
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FLOYD
Defendant:
DAVID JOHNSON, LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and LYFT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ROBINSON v. COSMEN et al
as 2:2023cv01829
Plaintiff:
TONYA ROBINSON
Defendant:
DEVAUGHN COSMEN and LYFT INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PITTS v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01310
Plaintiff:
GENOVEVA PITTS
Defendant:
LYFT, INC. and NASIRU TEJAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kassim Mouzone, et al v. Lyft Inc, et al
as 23-1400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KASSIM MOUZONE and OMAYRA DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
LYFT INC and MR. BIENVENIDO, LYFT DRIVER AND EMPLOYEE
MULBAH v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04672
Defendant:
LYFT, INC., LYFT, FLEXDRIVE SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRUSH MULBAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
HAVENS v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv06546
Plaintiff:
Jennie Havens
Defendant:
LYFT INC., INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, Kenneth Ekefre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
LEELIKE v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04268
Plaintiff:
ANDREA LEELIKE
Defendant:
LYFT, INC., BRANDON BARDOWSKY, AJA BARDOWSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MAGUIRE v. LYFT, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02235
Plaintiff:
SEAN P. MAGUIRE, JR.
Defendant:
LYFT, INC. and ANGEL LUCERO-SOSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
CASTANEDA v. LYFT, INC.
as 1:2021cv20557
Plaintiff:
CARLOS CASTANEDA
Defendant:
LYFT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KACZYNSKI et al v. RAHMAN et al
as 2:2021cv01715
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY KACZYNSKI, WALTER KACZYNSKI and JOSHUA KACZYNSKI
Defendant:
TARAKUR RAHMAN and LYFT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
